[JULY
8, 20008] : The
new trial date is scheduled for June 8, 2009 because the Defense lawyers
filed an appeal claiming that a retrial constituted double jeopardy
after a U.S. appeals court threw out the original guilty verdict and
declared a mistrial.
read
more : Graves
murder trial moved to June 2009 - Bryan/College
Station Eagle
[JUNE
13, 20008] : about
the hearing of May 21, 2008 :
[MAY
25, 20008] :
- Hearing
of April 4, 2008 : Anthony Graves refused an offer
of a life sentence from the prosecution in return for a guilty plea.
Several
constitutional motions were presented to the court by the judge. They
were denied.
Two
new lawyers are appointed : Katherine Scardino ( from Houston, Tx) and
Jimmy Pillips (from Angleton, Tx) - K. Scardino is appointed lead counsel.
- Hearing
of May 21, 2008 :
The
defense had filed a writ of habeas corpus for the judge to dismiss the
indictment against Anthony Graves. The lawyers argued that a new trial
cannot be a fair trial because Robert Carter has been executed. He can
never be put on the witness stand to testify to a jury.
The judge denied this motion. The defense appeals this decision. This
appeal could set the trial date back.
Read more : Judge
to allow dead witness's testimony / The transcripts of co-defendant
to be included in inmate's retrial - By HARVEY RICE - May
22, 2008
[February
23, Febrary 26, 20008]
On
February 22, 2008 was set a new pre trial hearing ; the judge set the
trial date for July 7, 2008 in Giddings, Texas located in Lee County
and part of her judicial district.
She
has granted a new lead counsel for the defense to replace Jeff Blackburn
who needs to step down for family matters.
The
DNA test results were inconclusive- the DNA was too contaminated to
yield results.
Read
more : Murder
retrial changes venues
- Houston Chronicle
[September
19, 2007] & [September
21, 2007]
: A
new documentary on TV 14
Innocence
Files®
- Rated:
TV14 - http://www.aetv.com
- Running
Time: 60 Minutes
- Upcoming
Airings:
- Thursday,
September 20 @ 11pm/10C
- Friday,
September 21 @ 3am/2C
A
look at the work of college students who take on the cases of jailed
murderers who claim they're innocent. With exclusive, behind-the-scenes
access to Innocence Projects at the University of Cincinnati and Texas
Tech University, viewers watch as the students visit the inmates, track
down key witnesses, and seek DNA testing that could prove their clients'
innocence. We focus on the cases of Anthony Graves, a Texas death row
prisoner, and Glen Tinney, a mentally ill Ohio inmate who pleaded guilty
but now says he didn't do the crime. http://www.aetv.com/listings/episode_details.do?episodeid=241612
“
I just
watched the documentary on the Anthony Graves Murder Case and
cannot believe that a case of blatant cronyism can go nationally
broadcast without some sort of legal investigation...”
>>>
Read
the comments of the vewers
[August
24, 2007]
|
$
90 000.00 + $ 172 000.00
=
The
cost of Anthony Graves' retrial
The
States has spent approximately $ 90 000.00 this year and
Burleson County have budgeted above $ 172 000.00 for 2008.
These expenses are for the new prosecutor named, the investigations
and other expenses incurred by the defense and the prosecutor.
source : Burleson
County update
The
5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last year that the state withheld
two statements made by Carter that they believe might have changed
the jury's mind in Anthony Graves' first trial.
"These
statements are particularly important in this case because Graves'
conviction rests almost entirely on Carter's testimony and there
is no dire ct evidence linking him with Carter or with the murder
scene other than Carter's testimony." said the judges in
their opinion
of March 6, 2006.
The
Federal Court "granted the Habeas Corpus, unless the state
proceeds to retry petitioner within a reasonable time."
The
States has decided to retrial Anthony Graves and to keep him in
prison in spite of another federal judge decision who granted
him to be free on bond pending any retrial.
After
almost 18 months, Anthony Graves is still in jail and the date
of the trial is not set.
|
Former
prosecutor, Charles Sebesta who condemned Anthony Graves, is number
7 among the Ten worst U.S. prosecutors named, according The Bennet Law
Firm. >> http://www.desmainsunies.com/anthonygraves2/mediaP68.htm
Read
more : http://bennettlawfirm.typepad.com/badprosecutors/
[August
2, 2007] During
a brief teleconference with attorneys, Caldwell-based District Judge
Reva Towslee-Corbett granted the defense's motion for a change of venue.
The
judge has not determined where to move the trial. It won't
take place in Caldwell, where the pre-trial hearings have taken place,
or in Brazoria County, where the first trial was held. It also won't
take place in Brazos County.
The
prosecutor told the judge that the DPS crime lab will not have lab reports
on the physical evidence until Sept. 30. At that point, the defense
will be allowed to conduct our lab testing.
The
pre trial hearing had been canceled.
Read
more :
[July
21, 2007]
“When
it comes to the retrial of death row inmate Anthony Graves, Burleson
Co. District Judge Reva Towslee-Corbett apparently doesn't feel the
need to comply with the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals or, for that
matter, with the opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court. Perhaps Justice
Antonin Scalia simply isn't conservative enough for the Texas judge.
Or maybe Towslee-Corbett is – dare we say it? – completely
biased against Graves. Considering the latest ruling she's made in Graves'
case, it would seem that one or the other – if not both –
must be true. [...] ” >>> READ MORE in
Austin Chronicle Anthony
Graves Update: Defense team shot down again By
Jordan Smith
Next
pretrial hearing : on July 31, 2007
[July
17, 2007] Judge
Towslee denied last week the motion to suppress Robert Carter's testimony
without explanation ; Anthony Graves' lawyers asked to suppress Robert
Carter's because he is no longer alive to be cross-examined
; their request was only based on the law.
"Of all the protections in the Bill of Rights that are afforded to
a defendant, I can't think of one that's more important than this one,"
Mullin said for the latest pretrial hearing. So today, we wonder whether
Judge Towslee rules in favor of Justice or whether she only rules in
favor of the prosecution...
Anthony
Graves' defense suffers setback - Judge
will let prosecutors use 1994 testimony of a witness who later recanted
- By HARVEY RICE - Houston Chronicle
- July 12, 2007
[May
23, 2007] Pretrial hearing of May 22 :
-
The evidence : an inventory of the physical evidence recently
found has been given to the lawyers ; in a first time, only five items
will be tested by the Department Public Safety scientists ; the lab
wil try to have the results by the end of june. Anthony Graves said
that he wanted every piece of evidence to be fully tested. These tests
will delay the trial date.
-
The change of venue : Anthony Graves' lawyers had 5 witnesses who
testified that Anthony Graves cannot receive a fair trial in Burleson
County and the Prosecutor filed a controverting affidavit by someone
in Burleson County who said the opposite. The judge will consider the
motion and will rule in about a month.
-
The motion to suppress Robert Carter's testimony : Anthony Graves'
lawyers ask to suppress all of Carter's previous testimony because he's
no longer alive to be cross-examined. The Prosecutor Batchelor argued
this motion ; he has appointed a new assistant who is an "appelate
specialist" Charles Chuck Mallin, who plans to appeal the ruling
if the judge rules in favor of the suppression of Carter's testimony.
[May
1st, 2007] More interesting coverage on the hearing of
April 13 :
[April
14, 2007] Pretrial hearing of April 13 :
The
judge did reduce the bond from a million to 6 hundred thousand. That
means at 10%, Anthony Graves would need 60 thousand dollars to be freed
on bond.
The
prosecutor has not found any of the evidence that he had to have for
this hearing. He said that all that they did find was tested and tested
negative stating that none of the evidence showed that Anthony Graves
was involved ; but many items that were taken at the scene are not recovered.
If
certain items are not recovered, the defense will file a motion requesting
that the case dismissed.
The
next hearing is scheduled for May 22.
The
judge set a tentative trial date for July 10. But this date will surely
change.
[April
2, 2007]
[March
28, 2007]
[March
25, 2007]
Batchelor,
the new prosecutor just filed his decision to seek the death penalty
for Anthony Graves >> read : Former
Texas death-row inmate to face death again - by Harvey Rice - Houston
Chronicle - March 23, 2007
In
an opinion of March 21, 2007 the Tenth Court of Appeals grants the writ
of mandamus requested by the defense to set aside the gag order imposed
by the judge Reva L. Towslee-Corbett.>> Gag
order quashed in Somerville slayings - By
HARVEY RICE - Houston Chronicle - March 26, 2007
More
development on the previous hearing of March 9, in Caldwell. >>
Disclosure
debated at Graves hearing - Burleson
County Tribune, p. 1, March 15, 2007
[March
12, 2007] A hearing was set on March 9, in Caldwell, TX.
The
judge didn't make a decision regarding the bail; she needs to consider
the lawyers objections and study the law before ruling on the bond.She
said, she will have a decision at the next hearing on April 13.
The
judge did not set a trial date but she would prefer that it starts in
late June, but certainly "no later than August".
Ranger
Coffman was called at the the stand as a witness ; but he changed again
his testimony, saying that Robert Carter never told him that he acted
alone.
The
District Attorney admitted that he cannot find any of the physical evidence
in the case other than the "identical " knife. Even the victims'
skullcapps are missing. However, he said he's still looking for that
evidence.
To
know more :
Capital
murder retrial planned - Eagle Staff Writter - March 10,2007
Top
Ranger contradicts himsel in Graves case - Houston Chronicle - March
10, 2007
[January
21, 2007] The pretrial hearing of january 22, is cancelled
[January
9, 2007] New
prosecutor named to retry Anthony Graves Batchelor
tried a man executed after evidence challenge
- By
HARVEY RICE - Houston
Chronicle -(01/00/2007)
[January
6, 2007] Anthony Graves released by the
federal judge and immediataly rearested by the States .
A
federal judge set a hearing on January 5, in Galveston to sign the $50,000
federal bond and to release Anthony Graves. Anthony GRaves' lawyers
paid the federal bond and the federal judge let him out of federal custody
; but Anthony Graves was rearested in the courthouse hallway on the
state charge. The federal judge said he had no authority to interfere
with the state judge's million dollar bond, even though he said he personally
believes that it is excessive and oppressive.
The
state judge appointed Patrick Batchelor as the special prosecutor for
the case.
Read
more and watch the video on KHOU TV :
[January
5, 2007] A federal bond hearing is scheduled in Galveston on January
5, afternoon.
Special
prosecutor appointed in Graves murder retrial - By
HARVEY RICE - Houston Chronicle (01/05/2007)
Graves
Update: Judge thumbs nose at feds by Jordan
Smith - Austin Chonicle -December 29, 2006
[December
26, 2006] On december 20, 2006 Judge Towslee Corbett set Anthony Graves'
bond at $1 million. >>
>
Burleson
County District Attorney Renee Mueller filed a motion voluntarily recusing
her entire office from handling the retrial of Anthony Graves
>> Graves
Free on Bond; Prosecutor Withdraws - Austin Chronicle - december
20, 2006
[December
19, 2006] The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously denied the state's
to motion to stop Anthony's release on bond, but gave the state until
Jan. 4 to hold a state bond hearing.
Read
more :
http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/unpub/06/06-70050.0.wpd.pdf
Ex-death
row inmate to stay in Burleson jail for holidays -
By
HARVEY RICE - Houston Chronicle - Dec.
19, 2006
[December
12, 2006]>>
Prosecutor
off retrial of Graves in '92 slayings By
CINDY GEORGE - Houston Chronicle (12/12/2006)
[December
9, 2006] >> Judge
Reva Towslee-Corbett grants recusal of Joan E.Scroggins in Anthony Graves
retrial. (see below about this motion)
[December
6, 2006]
A
pretrial hearing on Nov 30, revealed that the prosecution in Anthony
Graves' trial in 1994, didn't say all the truth. Two new testimonies
show strong contradictions between former D.A. Charles Sebesta's allegations
at the first trial that sent Anthony Graves in death row for 12 years
and the reality. >>>
(12/05/2006) http://www.desmainsunies.com/anthonygraves2/mediaP33.htm
Judge
Reva Towslee-Corbett said that she will maintain the gag order she issued
in September in spite this order could prevent Anthony Graves from receiving
a fair trial.
A
new hearing for other pretrial motions is set on Wednesday Dec. 20
About
the gag order :
About
Scroggins recusal :
[November
10, 2006] The judge of the district court
grants Anthony Graves release ; but the States appeal to the 5th circuit
Court and wins a stay of the release pending the outcome of the appeal
in 30 days.
Read
more this incredible story of conflicting courts orders while Anthony
Graves is still in jail for a murder he has nothing to do with ! >>
Freedom
fleeting for inmate Graves
After judge gave order for release, state prevails again
to keep him in jail pending his retrial
By
HARVEY RICE - Houston Chronicle -
Nov. 10, 2006
[October
29, 2006], On Friday 27, October a pretrial
hearing was set in Caldwell ; the judge granted some motions :
-She
granted Anthony Graves to wear regular clothes, and $400 to buy his
clothes
-
She granted money to hire some experts (a criminologist, an investigator,
a venue analyst and a mitigation specialist)
She
postponed a lot of motions. She did not rule on defense motions
to lift the gag order and to remove Joan Scroggins, assistant district
attorney for Washington and Burleson counties, from the prosecution
because she was a member of the 1994 prosecution team.
She
did not set a trial date yet.
Another
retrial hearing is scheduled on November 30, at 10 am.
This
hearing was presided by Reva Towslee-Corbett whose the father, Harold
Towslee, presided over the 1994 trial in which Anthony Graves was convicted
of capital murder.
But,
before this hearing, an unexpected hearing was set by the judge Underwood
who refused to recuse Reva Towslee-Corbett as the judge presiding over
the retrial of Anthony Graves.
According
the medias, Underwood said Towslee-Corbett asked him to convene the
hearing after the defense filed a motion asking her if there was any
reason she should recuse herself. Underwood sent out a letter Wednesday
notifying attorneys of the hearing, giving them only one day to prepare.
This special hearing seems to be nor normal and nor correct.
to
know more :
-
Judge's
denial of motion stuns Graves' attorneys - Defense says it never
requested a hearing for jurist's recusal from the inmate's retrial -By
HARVEY RICE - Houston Chronicle (10/27/2006)
[October
19 , 2006] Update
-
about the State Petition for a writ of certiorari :
US
Suprem court denied the petiion on october 2.
-
about Anthony Graves release and the bail :
US
Magistrate Judge John Froeshner recommanded on October 4 that Anthony
Graves be released on $ 50 000 bail while awaiting retrial. The State
asked for a $ one million bail. The final decision might be given by
Judge Kent on October 23, if the State don't object Judge John Froeshner'
recommendations.
-
about the retrial :
Judge
Reva Towlee-Corbett has scheduled a pretrial hearing in Caldwell on
October 27 at 10 am.
According
the medias, some court officials in the retrial are connected to the
first trial ; professors of law said that these connections might create
an appearance of unfairness. Among these persons, the presiding judge
in the retrial, Reva Towslee-Corbett is the daughter of the jdge who
presided over the 1994 trial.
[September
30, 2006] The federal court has granted a bail of $50,000
to release Anthony ; the State
attorneys oppose the bail, and want it to be at least $1 million. The
federal judge has scheduled a hearing on October 4 to decide the amount
of the bail.
The
US Suprem court conference scheduled on September 25, is postponed on
October 2.
[September
10, 2006] A new trial for Anthony Graves
:
>>> Death
row inmate starts 2nd chance Hearing
begins process of a new trial for Graves - by HARVEY RICE - Houston
Chronicle (09/09/2006)
[September
7, 2006] On Friday, September 8, will be set a pretrial hearing in Caldwell
; the outcome the outcome will determine whether or not the trial goes
ahead. The hearing is open to the public. 11 am
Read
to : Death
row inmate Graves may be freed on bail Houston Chronicle September
1st.
Read
the Federal court decision : http://www.desmainsunies.com/anthonygraves2/06032006.htm
[August
8, 2006 - update - 2 civil actions pending] On
May 16 2006, the District Court of Galveston entered an amended order
conditionally granting the writ unless the States retrial within 120
days (until September 12, 2006).
The
States filed his petition for writ of certiorari on May 31, 2006; Anthony
Graves' lawyer M. Greenwood, filed his opposition to the States' petition
on June 20, 2006. The Suprem Court Docket reflects that on July 5, 2006,
the case was distributed for conference of September 25, 2006.
On
June 7, the States filed a motion to stay the Court's Amended Order
pending disposition by the Supreme Court of his petition for writ of
certiorari. Anthony Graves' new lawyer, David Mullin, filed his response
and requested the Court to deny the States' Motion to Stay this Court's
Amended Order and to grant Anthony Graves motion for release and order
his immediate release (pursuant to Rule 23 (c)). He also asked an oral
argument.
On
July 26, in a short document, the States files his opposition for release
and requests again the Court to stay its amended order conditionnaly
granted relief pending resolution of the petition for writ of certiorari.
David Mullin just files Anthony Graves' reply.
[May
22, 2006]
The Attorney General'Office might appeal the 5th Circuit ruling before
the US Supreme Court on June 3. If no appeal is filed by June 3, the
state has until Sept 12 to retry him or set him free.
Read
: Ex-DA
says ruling hurts his reputation - Houston Chronicle May 22, 2006
[04/06/2006
UPDATE] The 5 th circuit court décison
: habeas corpus, granted !!!
>>
Read the decision : www.desmainsunies.com/anthonygraves2/06032006.htm
http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/05/05-70011-CV0.wpd.pdf
>>
Medias :
|
What
is going on now ?
In
first, the State can appeal the 3-judge decision to the full panel
of 5th circuit judges. The state would ask the full 15-judge panel
to review the decision.
The
state could then appeal the 5th Circuit's decision to the U.S.
Supreme Court. The Attorney General has been granted until April
16 to make a decision.
If
no further review is sought, the court will order a new trial
to be conducted within 120 days.
Third,
the state could release Anthony Graves without appealing the decision
and without retrying him.
|
[02/03/2006]
St.Thomas
students continue investigation into Graves case - Professor says evidence
flawed: Sebesta disagrees - Burleson County Tribune (01/19/2006)
[01/06/2006]
David
Brancaccio, host of the national PBS program Now,
examines two death penalty cases : Anthony Graves'case and Rueben
Cantu's case that raise troubling questions about the death penalty
.
[12/20/2005] The
5 circuit court has granted an oral argument on December 6, in Austin.
The argument was presented by Anthony Graves lawyers and the District
Attoney to a panel of judges.
A letter has been disclosed few minutes before
the hearing of December 6 ; it was written by Sebesta's assistant district
attorney Bill Torrey and concerned the interrogation of Carter the night
before the trial. The letter notes the importance of an assistant's work
in questioning Carter. "This examination ... was instrumental in 'breaking'
down Carter's resistance and facilitating testimony, testimony which,
in post-verdict interviews with jurors, was absolutely essential in their
minds, toward corroborating a largely circumstantial case," .
Houston attorney DeGuerin
signed an affidavit last month stating that a Brenham woman was prepared
to testify at Graves' trial that she was speaking with Graves on the phone
about the time of the murders.
Read more about this
hearing and these new facts :
Appellate
judges hear Graves' plea for new trial - Houston Chronicle (12/06/2005)
Lawyers
fight for a new trial in killings of 6/Attorneys
say evidence backing Anthony Graves' alibi has surfaced - By HARVEY
RICE - Houston Chronicle (12/05/2005)
[08/02/2005] A
new book with a comment about Anthony Graves' case:
Executed on a technicability
- Lethal Injustice
on America's Death row
By David Dow - Edited
by Beacon
David R. Dow is
professor of law at the University of Houston Law Center and the founder
and director of the Texas
Innocence Network
In this book, Professor
Dow gives a comment about Anthony Graves' case (page 123) - Read a
new article on this book>>> Frequent
Injustice BY
PATRICK TIMMONS
with some comments about Anthony Graves' case-
>> THE
IMPORTANCE OF FINALITY BY
DAVID DOW
[02/22/2005] The judge Samuel
B. Kent issued his decision on january 16, and affirmed the magistrate's
recommendation, denying Anthony Graves a new trial. Anthony Graves lawyers
appeal to this decision.
[01/10/2005] Medias : Students
say prosecutor made Graves mistake - Group says evidence never linked
him to the 1992 slayings -By HARVEY RICE - HOUSTON
CHRONICLE
[12/15/2004]
Medias : Death
row inmate trying to save another man's life 07:01
PM CST on Monday, December 13, 2004 By Dan Lauck / 11 News
[11/19/2004]
The federal magistrate judge Froeshner
has recommended
that Anthony Graves be denied a new trial. Anthony's lawyers have until
November 22, 2004 to write their objections.
>> To know
more :
Nov.
10, 2004, Judge
advises against new trial - Statement was unlikely to have influenced
Graves jury, he says By HARVEY RICE - Houston Chronicle
Anthony
Graves' letter :
My
Dearest Supporters,
I don't really
know how to begin this letter. Obviously my mind is still trying
to process the following information that I received this morning.
Apparently, on November the 8th, The U.S. Magistrate that presided
over my resent hearing of september the 28th-30th, handed down his
horrible ruling.[...]
[10/30/2004]Juror
regrets role in capital conviction - A new trial could be ordered if judge
in Galveston finds evidence hidden
By HARVEY RICE - Houston Chronicle
[10/06/04]
Read
Anthony's letter about the hearing
"To:
My Dearest Friends & Supporters,
First
of all, I want to say thanks. Thanks for all of the prayers that
you and your family sent up for Me and my family in our time of
most need. I do appreciate it. Let me start by saying that, the
over all hearing went quite well, if I must say so myself; But,
let me walk through the hearing with you, beginning with Tuesday
night the 27th before the hearing. [...]"
[10/04/04]
The evidentiary hearing which was postponed on April, was set to the District
Court in Galveston on September 28 th at 10 o'clock :
In an opinion
(1) on August
15th, the 5th
Circuit Court found that the
suppression of Carter's statements to the district attorney, the night
before his testimony, should have been divulgued to trial counsel and
ordred further hearings in the District Court in Gavelston.On
November 13h 2003, the same court issued an opinion (2)
in Anthony's case that sends his case for a new hearing on a second issue.
The
federal distrcit court in Galveston, had to consider 2 issues : 1) whether
the prosecutor should have told Anthony's counsel about Carter's statement
exonarating Anthony : "I did it all myself" and 2) whether
the state should have told Anthony's counsel about Carter 's statement
implicating his wife "Cookie".
On September 28, Judge
Froeschner opened the proceeding by stating that he was going to allow
the lawyers to present all their evidence ; Bill Torrey, Sebesta's assistant
(the former prosecutor) was the first witness. Then came Charles Sebesta,
Lydia Clay-Jackson and Calvin Garvie (two Anthony's lawyers to the trial).
Bill Torrey said there
was not a lot of communication between Sebesta and him. He testified "there
was some trouble about getting Carter's testimony". He said that
he didn't tell Anthony's lawyer about Carter's claim " I dit it all
myself" because he didn't know it.
Sebesta said that he
first told the state attorney that he did not tell Garvie Carter's statement
"I did it all myself", because he forgot running into him in
the courtroom. He said that he then "pieced things together"
by reading the 5th Circuit's opinion and the trial transcripts; he "pieced
together" his memory of telling Garvie in the hallway.
Lydia Clay-Jackson said
that she thought the state indicted Cookie to put pressure against Carter
; she said too that if Sebesta had told Mr Garvie about Robert's statement,
he would have told her. To the question "would knowledge of Carter's
statements have been helpful to your case ?", she replied "Most
assuredly".
Calvin Garvie testified
that he and Lydia believed most strongly that Anthony did not commit the
crime; he said that the state never proved a motive, and that they had
alibi witnesses to show that Anthony was with his relatives and his girlfriend
on the night of the murders. He also said that he found out years later
that Carter had told Sebesta "I did it all myself" and Sebesta
never told defense counsel that Cookie was involved. He said that would
had been a " huge statement" to know that Carter had said "I
did it all myself".
Then the judge adjourned
until wednesday at 11 a.m for legal arguments.
On wednesday, the State
went first and made a brief statement for 15 minutes. The state argued
that Carter's statements were nothing new and that Sebesta's failure to
inform defense counsel of those statements was harmless error; the jury
would have found Anthony gulity even if the jury knew about these aditional
statements.
Greenwood argued that
exact opposite for a hour: the statements would have made a great deal
of difference to the case and Sebesta had plenty of time to tell defense
counsel about them.
The judge said that
he would write a report to Judge Kent. Both Anthony's lawyers and the
state's lawyers will have an opportunity to comment on or make objections
to the report before it goes to Judge Kent. Then Judge Kent will make
a ruling.
The judge said that
he cannot rule in Anthony's favor unless he finds that the statements
WOULD have made a difference in the outcome of the case, not just that
the statements MIGHT have made a difference in the case.
http://www.desmainsunies.com/anthonygraves2/15082003.htm
http://www.desmainsunies.com/anthonygraves2/13112003.htm
|